encanta_anima

stupid question warning:

what if you make a medtech, and decide to drug all people and have them flown to Hongkong? That would change the setting a great deal wouldn't it?

Er, I am supposing the page isn't a mockery of the consumerist society we're living in? >.<

How exactly does 18k amount to more than 2500k? Or perhaps I misunderstood something. >.<

I think, in general, that both men and women may be bad drivers and good drivers, though women tend to be more concerned with rules and such.

For example, my mother always drives ten km/h below speed limit because she's dead scared of accidents, whereas my dad drives 10km/h faster, because he wants to get places.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA It's Rumsfeldt pulling the strings when there's some real action going. Didn't you know?

With better developed motors that had higher combustion eficiency, and with the developing of fusion technology, energy supply would be no problem. Problem is, it requires the oil to run out first, because otherwise there wont be any desperate need to find alternative energy sources.

Science.

I wish you good luck. Me and a friend started up a b-pop-project last year. So far we haven't even gotten together to talk about it, other than deciding we're to becalled "DIe Reinwurmen"... Hopefully you have more ambitiousness, and plans for good music. This world needs more music!

Frankly, people need people who are protesting against everything just to make things happen. If there weren't hippies who were generally obtuse and protesting, there wouldn't be much change because pretty much everyone else is not bothered...

Every large protest movement's got to be started somewhere, and that somewhere is more often than not the universities and over-engaged people with high ideals.

Making space inhabitable for people include having a gravity field that makes it more like... er... home(?). Which means the moon is ideal, despite it have 6x lower g than earth. Placing a permanent space base in between would liberate the base from all g and it would be impossible for any one person to live in it for a longer time. Making everything computerized isn't a good way to go considering the relatively low standards of our androids. Perhaps if there were "real" AI's it would work, but there ain't.

I believe in creating a man-governed base on the moon because it would mean a lot to science and further space exploration.

Do you have the US or Iraq in mind? -__-

The tricky thing with Mr Bush is not decyphering what it is that HE is talking about in his speeches, but what the OTHER members of his parliament are plotting while he's making a fool out of himself.

According to a time chart I saw in today's paper, US are pretty much the only ones though who've ever successfully entered orbit and landed on Mars, so there's no denying they got skill.

Democracy is the living proof that the majority isn't always right.

First of all, that was a good and informative website contributed by Chrysalis. Thanks

second of all: it might be considered off-topic in a way, but it still proves a valid point concerning energy, and non-renewable energy sources.

Coming Energy Crisis

Isn't it sort of frustrating that they are including the plastic surgical compartments with cybernetics?

http://bork.hampshire.edu/~azar/cyber/law.html

If there's a boat, there's got to be a brawling drunkard (or at least heavily quaffing) character. I volunteer.

It's not so much that they aren't worth anything, in comparison with what they do with their worth. I think USA is a good country, given it has democrats in the rule who aren't constantly looking for alternative ways of dropping bombs on their environment.

With a bit of luck though, we'll have several moon bases by the end of the 2010's. I hope I'll qualify myself as a scientist allowed to go research on one of them *dreams away happily*

Not if you're a netrunner. Probably. At least if you stay indoors and don't make to much noise of yourself. Or you stay useful to the right people. They'll protect you...

there's always the risk of running blank on the EEG scan from some nasty shock program though.

True. True! Thanks for the support.

Very valid point, unfortunately. Mao Zedong said in the nineteenfifties that "might comes from the tip of a gun" (that sounds really geeky but it's a translation from the swedish version of the quote. I have no idea how it was originally translated to english. all corrections appreciated)

Easy, someone who is already criminal is someone who is not trying to be something else. Whereas I pose as this 16year old innocent girl who does nothing, meets no one, lives lawfully. How more suspicious can a character be?

Obviously, if there's a will, there's a way.

And once someone breached the first wall, there's usually tons of other people willing to follow... cybernetics are coming through!

There are no reasons to hold anyone >.< The Swedish person is there because he is "allegedly suspected of being in touch with <unspecified> terrorist organisation".

He hasn't done anything, they can't prove he's been in touch with AQ, they are simply holding him captive because he is a potential criminal. With that logic we should all go to jail, especially me.

Depends what genres of punk you're talking about though. I like old school punk, whereas oi thingie is totally detestable. I really don't like that. For some reason.

Ska is better if it's british than if it's American. Capdown is about the best group ever alive, at least when it comes to ska. Err... if that's a logical statement or not is up to the beholder. Less Than Jake aren't but a pain in the neck. *uses not bad language*

So, what do you people think will become history of all the things that happened in 2003? Which are most likely to have an impact on the coming year?

Err, that's a lot of Uranium. How come Australia isn't a nuclear post-reaction hole yet?

Apart from the kangaroos I mean.

I'm happy for you to have found something to dedicate your efforts to.